Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    Linux Client?

    Feathercoin Discussion
    11
    47
    9649
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      spynappels last edited by

      I presume it has feathercoind included as well? If it has, I’ll test on a headless Ubuntu server on Monday and provide feedback.

      Regards,
      Stefan

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Wellenreiter
        Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

        Got Feathercoin RPM for several SuSE Distributions (32 bit and 64 bit versions) on the Suse OBS.

        Currently provides just the qt binary. I will add the readme files soon.

        it can be found on http://software.opensuse.org/package/FeatherCoin?search_term=feather

        I would appreciate any feedback, if the installation works well or not, and what additional information should be included

        Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
        Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kevmif last edited by

          [quote name=“spynappels” post=“17026” timestamp=“1371936584”]
          I presume it has feathercoind included as well? If it has, I’ll test on a headless Ubuntu server on Monday and provide feedback.

          Regards,
          Stefan
          [/quote]

          It does not unfortunately. However, I can definitely compile it. Although I think they should be separate packages though.

          One would assume that anyone wanting to use feathercoind probably has the knowledge, knowhow and inclination to compile from source anyway. Users of feathercoin-qt not so much so. Or is that an unreasonable assumption? I certainly don’t mind attempting to package it, just trying to understand how worthwhile it would be?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kevmif last edited by

            [quote author=chrisj]
            I am not a Linux user but I would like to know when I can start sharing this with people in the trollbox and in the community please let me know when it’s okay for me to start getting it out there.

            Thanks for your hard work.
            [/quote]

            Thanks for the enthusiasm but as it is my first ever Debian package and there are some minor issues (such as the warning in the Ubuntu software center) I’d like feedback from members here first instead of people in the non FTC community thinking this is a half baked product.

            Also, this is in no way official. I am not an FTC developer or community leader. I’m just a FTC and Linux enthusiast who thought it would be good to give it a go. Just saying to make sure no one gets the wrong idea. Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              chrisj Regular Member last edited by

              [quote name=“kevmif” post=“17046” timestamp=“1371944719”]
              [quote author=chrisj
              I am not a Linux user but I would like to know when I can start sharing this with people in the trollbox and in the community please let me know when it’s okay for me to start getting it out there.

              Thanks for your hard work.
              [/quote]

              Thanks for the enthusiasm but as it is my first ever Debian package and there are some minor issues (such as the warning in the Ubuntu software center) I’d like feedback from members here first instead of people in the non FTC community thinking this is a half baked product.

              Also, this is in no way official. I am not an FTC developer or community leader. I’m just a FTC and Linux enthusiast who thought it would be good to give it a go. Just saying to make sure no one gets the wrong idea. Thanks
              [/quote]

              Top man, thanks.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevmif last edited by

                New version. Slight packaging improvements. Still has warnings though but is fully functional.

                Update:

                New, new version. This time without a stupid warning for users of Ubuntu 13.04

                Could someone with an earlier version of Ubuntu please test too?

                https://www.dropbox.com/s/3bd0or6h50yjut7/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kevmif last edited by

                  On an older version there appears to be a dependency error according to a colleague who did some testing for me. I am installing 12.04 LTS in to a VM now for testing. Any feedback is appreciated.

                  Thanks

                  edit:
                  Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and its derivatives do not appear to be able to resolve dependencies.
                  12.x versions of Ubuntu don’t have the required boost libraries available. I shall see if it can compile with an older version or look in to packaging the correct libraries with the application.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    solasaurus last edited by

                    [quote name=“kevmif” post=“17054” timestamp=“1371949000”]

                    New version. Slight packaging improvements. Still has warnings though but is fully functional.

                    Update:

                    New, new version. This time without a stupid warning for users of Ubuntu 13.04

                    Could someone with an earlier version of Ubuntu please test too?

                    https://www.dropbox.com/s/3bd0or6h50yjut7/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb
                    [/quote]

                    Thanks kevmif for taking the time to compile this .deb package. As a noob to feathercoin who’s having some serious hurdles when it comes to compiling, having an easy to use .deb would be real handy.

                    So I downloaded your feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb to check it out on my LinuxMint 15 (based on Ubuntu 13.04) amd64 machine using the package installer I got a notice that several packages were to be uninstalled, including:
                    [list]
                    [*]bitcoin-qt
                    [*]libboost-filesystem-dev
                    [*]libminiupnpc-dev
                    [*]transmission-gtk
                    [/list]

                    I wasn’t so worried about the libboost* and *miniupnpc* packages, because these appeared to get replaced with i386 versions. But it seemed odd that transmission and bitcoin-qt got the boot. This may be something to do with the fact you’ve created this for i386. It’s possible to run i386 packages on amd64 machines, but to be honest, I’ve run into difficulties in the past doing this, and it looks like I’m about to have similar problems again. So I’m backing out of testing this package right now.

                    Thanks again for having a go at this - and apologies for not being able to help you out with this one. I’d be happy to test an amd64 version of the package should one become available.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • U
                      UKMark last edited by

                      [quote name=“kevmif” post=“17083” timestamp=“1371954338”]
                      On an older version there appears to be a dependency error according to a colleague who did some testing for me. I am installing 12.04 LTS in to a VM now for testing. Any feedback is appreciated.

                      Thanks

                      edit:
                      Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and its derivatives do not appear to be able to resolve dependencies.
                      12.x versions of Ubuntu don’t have the required boost libraries available. I shall see if it can compile with an older version or look in to packaging the correct libraries with the application.
                      [/quote]

                      Yeah I tested your .deb on NutNuts p2pool .vdi (which is Ubuntu 12.04 if I remember correctly) and had the lib dependency issues - If it helps you in creating a 12.04 compatible .deb I ended up building QT with total success on the .vdi using this guide:

                      http://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?topic=430.msg3621#msg3621

                      Thanks for taking the time to do this! 8)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kevmif last edited by

                        [quote name=“solasaurus” post=“17168” timestamp=“1371990235”]

                        Thanks kevmif for taking the time to compile this .deb package. As a noob to feathercoin who’s having some serious hurdles when it comes to compiling, having an easy to use .deb would be real handy.

                        So I downloaded your feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb to check it out on my LinuxMint 15 (based on Ubuntu 13.04) amd64 machine using the package installer I got a notice that several packages were to be uninstalled, including:
                        [list]
                        [*]bitcoin-qt
                        [*]libboost-filesystem-dev
                        [*]libminiupnpc-dev
                        [*]transmission-gtk
                        [/list]

                        I wasn’t so worried about the libboost* and *miniupnpc* packages, because these appeared to get replaced with i386 versions. But it seemed odd that transmission and bitcoin-qt got the boot. This may be something to do with the fact you’ve created this for i386. It’s possible to run i386 packages on amd64 machines, but to be honest, I’ve run into difficulties in the past doing this, and it looks like I’m about to have similar problems again. So I’m backing out of testing this package right now.

                        Thanks again for having a go at this - and apologies for not being able to help you out with this one. I’d be happy to test an amd64 version of the package should one become available.
                        [/quote]

                        Thank you for the feedback. I will look at compiling 64 bit versions in future.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kevmif last edited by

                          [quote name=“UKMark” post=“17169” timestamp=“1371990632”]
                          Yeah I tested your .deb on NutNuts p2pool .vdi (which is Ubuntu 12.04 if I remember correctly) and had the lib dependency issues - If it helps you in creating a 12.04 compatible .deb I ended up building QT with total success on the .vdi using this guide:

                          http://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?topic=430.msg3621#msg3621

                          Thanks for taking the time to do this! 8)
                          [/quote]

                          Thank you for the feedback.
                          12.04 package is on its way… standby!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kevmif last edited by

                            As promised. This version will work for 12.04 and hopefully all derivatives.

                            https://www.dropbox.com/s/jmwalrnxa2iz3g1/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-4.12.04LTS.deb

                            And the existing version for Ubuntu 13.04 and Mint 14 (also possibly Ubuntu 12.10)

                            https://www.dropbox.com/s/3bd0or6h50yjut7/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb

                            I apologise for my poor naming structure. Its 1am here and I have to be at work in a few hours. Please go fourth and test. Any feedback is appreciated. Once we are all satisfied that these packages do the job i’ll tidy them up a bit and do new revisions. Perhaps my build could then be the official Debian client (if it does not suck haha).

                            Thanks all

                            –Kev

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kevmif last edited by

                              No one wanting to test?

                              It is important that we get some testing on these packages so hopefully Feathercoin can officially support at least some distributions one day.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                solasaurus last edited by

                                [quote name=“kevmif” post=“17333” timestamp=“1372071587”]
                                No one wanting to test?

                                It is important that we get some testing on these packages so hopefully Feathercoin can officially support at least some distributions one day.
                                [/quote]

                                Hi kevmif,

                                I’ve had some long hours at work and only just got to this post. Just remembered that I had an old Dell laptop which I’d installed LinuxMing 14. Cos you went to all the effort of making the .debs, I thought I’d try it out.

                                Well it seems to have worked like a charm. It’s started downloading the blockchain automatically, gave a “Network Alert” about upgrading to Litecoin [sic] 0.6.9.1 by August 15th (I presume this is intended). I need to load my wallet on this machine, but so far so good. I’ll let you know if I come across any bugs whilst using it.

                                Again - thanks for taking the time to create a .deb! :D

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  solasaurus last edited by

                                  Oh, forgot to mention I was using this .deb:

                                  https://www.dropbox.com/s/3bd0or6h50yjut7/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-3.deb

                                  Running on a Dell Inspiron 1525, running LinuxMint 14 (based on Ubuntu 12.10).

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kevmif last edited by

                                    Thank you solasaurus

                                    The litecoin warning is affecting everyone - it seems that notification section wasn’t amended when FTC was forked from LTC.

                                    I will be attempting to compile and package 64 bit tonight. We’ll see how that goes. Thanks for the feedback.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      kevmif last edited by

                                      https://www.dropbox.com/s/s3gwzaz8z90qk3d/feathercoin-qt0.6.4.1-4x64.deb

                                      64bit version for 13.04 and derivatives. May work on 12.10 also. Installs and run fine on a clean install.

                                      Likely will not work on 12.04LTS or derivatives.

                                      solasaurus - I am especially interested in your feedback since you had dependency issues with the 32 bit package.

                                      Thanks

                                      Note: This is still the old version as bushstar only released the new one a few minutes ago. Will compile all current binaries with the new source code tomorrow or not long after.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        solasaurus last edited by

                                        Firstly, I just want to say kevmif, it’s people with a can-do attitude like you that are going to make feathercoin a success. Very impressed with how quickly you moved on this issue (and no doubt you’ve got a day job too!)

                                        Now the matter at hand: Just installed the amd64 .deb on my HP Touchsmart 610 with no troubles at all using GDebiPackage installer (no doubt would have worked with apt-get or other installer too). It instantly recognized my wallet. Have got the annoying Litecoin network alert, but I get that that’s come from the source. The blockchain is up to date and there are active connections. So it’s looking pretty good.

                                        I’m gonna tinker with this more on friday/saturday (gotta real long day tomorrow) when I’ve got more time, and will report back again. So far, no noticeable bugs.

                                        Thanks for making the effort to make installing the FTC wallet on linux machines!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kevmif last edited by

                                          No problems. I expect to have the updated source compiled and available shortly. Maybe tomorrow night (24 hours or so) depending on work commitments.

                                          Thanks for the positive feedback.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            sekoj last edited by

                                            Hi,

                                            Just installed the 64Bit version on my Ubuntu laptop. No dependency problems at all.

                                            The blockchain also took very little time to download, especially compared to the Bitcoin and LTC blockchains.

                                            This works really well, good job well executed. Kudos

                                            Note: The Litecoin upgrade message keeps on appearing. Not sure if this is because of Unity or what…

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post