@Wellenreiter For what it’s worth, we were on 0.8.7. Usually someone from the Feathercoin team gets in touch with us when there’s an upgrade we need but we weren’t notified this time, and 0.9.3 doesn’t compile properly (although we’re working around this).

But I do need help!

Just a reminder - there is still nobody selling Feathercoin on Bittylicious.

It’ll need to be taken down if nobody is willing to sell for UK bank transfers.

So far, the latest 0.8 seems to be working well so I’ll stick with that for now. Thanks for the help.

[quote name=“acpacheco” post=“44218” timestamp=“1387017749”]
Hi all, it is great news. However I just tried to buy my first FTC there and it said not enough coins availiable. They must have sold out already? :([/quote]
What country are you in? There should be plenty of coins available in the UK, but not in The Netherlands.

Just a reminder - there is still nobody selling Feathercoin on Bittylicious.

It’ll need to be taken down if nobody is willing to sell for UK bank transfers.

So, all’s good from a technical perspective, but the person who used to sell a lot of FTC via bank transfer has sadly had his bank account shut down.

Thus, we need more sellers on the Bittylicious platform who can sell Feathercoin for UK bank transfers. If you want to keep Feathercoin alive on there, this really is needed as the demand for Feathercoin hasn’t been bad over the last month or two.

So far, the latest 0.8 seems to be working well so I’ll stick with that for now. Thanks for the help.

Thanks for that.

Actually, the only reason I was going for 0.9 was because I recognised 0.8 wasn’t working, presumably because I detected the fork early. I’m now using the latest 0.8 (as I much prefer to use release rather than pre-release versions) and functionality seems to be restored.

@Wellenreiter For what it’s worth, we were on 0.8.7. Usually someone from the Feathercoin team gets in touch with us when there’s an upgrade we need but we weren’t notified this time, and 0.9.3 doesn’t compile properly (although we’re working around this).

Hello,

I run Bittylicious and Feathercoin is on there. I’m currently running v0.8.7.2 and get the following in getinfo:

error: {“code”:-2,“message”:“Safe mode: Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade.”}

What should I be upgrading to? When trying to compile 0.9.3, I get some hideous errors as follows:

make[4]: Entering directory `/home/feathercoin/Feathercoin-0.9.3/src/test’
CXX test_bitcoin-base58_tests.o
base58_tests.cpp: In member function ‘void base58_tests::base58_keys_valid_parse::test_method()’:
base58_tests.cpp:155:35: error: ‘class CBitcoinSecret’ has no member named ‘GetKey’
base58_tests.cpp:157:13: error: ‘class CKey’ has no member named ‘size’
base58_tests.cpp:157:13: error: ‘class CKey’ has no member named ‘begin’
base58_tests.cpp:157:13: error: ‘class CKey’ has no member named ‘end’
…

On a related note, can the Feathercoin team please keep me up to date when new wallets are released as I can’t check all altcoin sites manually.

Thanks,

Marc

But I do need help!

Thanks for that, panoramix. You are now upgraded from troll to regular human being.

It sounds like your argument isn’t actually directed at Bittylicious at all, so I would say that it’s not really suitable for this thread. It would have been better to start a new thread with your concerns about Feathercoin and its place in the altcoin world. I suggest you still do this, even if there is duplicate content, as people won’t be looking for this information in a Bittylicious announcement thread.

panoramix, grow up. You’ve run out of things to say, so don’t repeat yourself as it just adds noise. Go to reddit if you want to troll.

I’m glad someone realised that I mentioned Feathercoin (and this was obviously entirely intended - Bittylicious accepts a fair few coins but Feathercoin is great, and “local”).

It’s a shame that people like panoramix seem to want to burn their bridges. Of course I won’t let it get to me, but some other partners might not be so understanding.