Topics created by AmDD

Have an updoot, sir!

@AmDD said in Full Node Status Page:

@Wellenreiter said in Full Node Status Page:

@wrapper said in Full Node Status Page:

Great, can we ban versions above ours as well as bellow? … 75000 = worldcoin

Better to ban based on subversion, banning on version number may cause problems during the roll out of new releases

Is there an easy way to do this? Automatically in the wallet? A script? Manually?

Currently it can be compiled in for the 11.x based code . There is no option do configure it through the command line or the config file and 0.9x doesn’t have that feature… yet ;)

Whilst I would be happy that Shapeshift did what they promised and reinstate FTC. I do not think we will re-add Shapeshift to the wallet, despite the bounty payements to program the SS and Coinotron add-ons.

Lizhi completed the bounty work by member request and is no longer available to maintain that code. By including the code, it may give the impression FTC is an exchange and expose members to unforseen legal requirements.

Great job man, that’s dope!

@wrapper said in Feathercoin Halving:

@AmDD Just wondering how the halving date is being estimated? and wither it might need an update. There seems a lot of interest.

Before the current upsurge in FTC and mining the blockchain was running at 1 min 06 secs per block. That’s gone up slightly to 1 min 10, so it may be worth a review.

I check it about weekly and update accordingly. The website uses a basic countdown time from a specific date. I calculate out the remaining blocks and figure out how many days that is and plug that date into the countdown script based on 60sec blocks. I use 60sec rather than the actual time between blocks because 60 is what the algro is trying to get to. And realistically a few seconds per block isnt going to make much of a difference in the end.

Exactly, what I noticed. We wold need an automated way, to use the small transactions to create larger ones.

Another problem is, that the transactions get too large, if you use many small inputs rather then some larger ones, and the output transaction gets rejected, because the overall size of the transaction becomes to large

If it is worth the money, is your own decision. It is like buying shares, nobody can tell tomorrows share value.

You may win or loose

Just a quick update on the farm… Current status: OFFLINE!

The house I was living in was just a rental and this summer my girlfriend and I bought a new house and have since moved into it. The new house has a smaller garage which is now full of boxes and furniture so I have less space for a farm.

I considered building a shed out back for them but havent totally talked myself into that yet. Also another consideration is building a larger garage (which I want anyway for all my other toys :) ) and moving the miners there. We’ll see what the spring brings but as for the short term I’ll probably setup 1-2 miners this winter just to do it with the added benefit of adding some extra heat to the garage.

@ghostlander Agreed. Its the biggest issue I have with P2Pool. Ive tried to change the difficulty to increase the size of payouts but that seems to only help so much.
Its the same way with the P2Pool fee for running the pool, Ive got ~500FTC in fees but like 1500 transactions.

alt text

current block from ‘block-explorer’ while posting this here…
is it sync…? is d block number accepted…?

Never even thought about that problem.
no clue :-(

Any java/Android programmers around that could help to check and maybe fix the code?

We all know the Blockchain was kickstarted by using it to produce “money”. As money has obvious value and it therefore needs “security”, it’s a good start point to evolve the right characteristics for a secure vault.

Whilst it will likely cause more confusion to change the description of the wallet to Keychain. The wallet is only part of the Blockchain and it is the Feathercoind daemon that is managing the “Blockchain” and Mining / Fault detection protocols that is the fundamental development that needs to occur.

Initially the wallet was required and also fulfilled the mining criteria, now most Bitcoin wallets used are probably not the Bitcoin Core, which means it is the daemon that is Bitcoins real “core”.

However, I think the idea of what the Keychain might put across and what that is in the eyes of the “Public” is complementary, and worth pursuing. Maybe FTC should consider Technical development of the “Keychain” version of the “wallet” which is directed to “other” services.

I would like to see some brainstorming on what services a FTC Keychain might contain or market to. For instance an Education market, where an exam board or Education to document your qualifications officially at very low cost in the FTC Keychain …

FTC could argue that we have maintained an open source secure network that would include many cpoies of secured data all over the world, and FTC-Keychain could make public or limit the data access, without any central server …

@bluebox

How did you get on? We did notice one problem p2pool - http://94.242.222.27:19327/static/ in Russia However that seems to be running fine now.

You may also consider you can run your own private p2pool node, and connect on that level (to multiple pools)

@AmDD diablo.cl is a SHA-256d kernel loaded by default. I think it’s time to make the whole SHA-256d CPU and GPU mining component of NSGminer optional and disabled by default. I don’t see any practical use for it.

Oh yes, PM me your email if you want to test my v7 beta kernel. It’s faster already than v6 and what NiceHash offers.

@AmDD said:

@RIPPEDDRAGON said:

@AmDD said:

I think I have one ASRock 970 Extreme4 (I’d have to double check that is what the board is) and an AMD CPU/cooler with it. The cpu is either a 145 Sempron or some higher end multi core Athlon.

I had 4 of those boards at one time - each with 4-5 7950’s but over time cards died and I never replaced them. I considered getting some 280’s or something and building another rig but havent due to time and power issues at the moment.

How many pci-e slots does it have? I am looking for boards with at least 6 usable pci-e slots so if/when I decide to go to 6 GPUs per rig again I have that option.

Only 5.

How much do you want for 1 cpu/mobo/ram combo?

I wasn’t referring to a private category, but thought, that the discussion leaves the original point of existing members not being able to post to a discussion about server rights and configuration, so it should move to a separated topic.

It’s a good fundraising idea for cryptsy. I’m not sold on its affectiveness yet though. I’d toss alittle in if interest grows

Of Course !! ;)

So great, thanks a lot Wellen.

Thanks for the response.

It was the firewall. After configuring the firewall for feathercoin-qt.exe solo mining works. I could not recall if the prompt to open the firewall came up when I started the program but I guess not.

btw, 192.168.1.* does work in the .conf file. * is a wildcard for any IP address.

Thanks again. This was an oversight on my part.