Craig Wright (not?) revealed as Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto
-
Just reading about this now.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36168863
Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright has publicly identified himself as Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
His admission ends years of speculation about who came up with the original ideas underlying the digital cash system.
Mr Wright has provided technical proof to back up his claim using coins known to be owned by Bitcoin’s creator.
and …
To prove that he was indeed Nakamoto, Wright provided proof to the BBC, the Economist, and GQ by signing an encrypted message with the cryptographic key that was associated with the first bitcoin transaction, a key that is inextricably linked to blocks of Bitcoins known to have been created by Satoshi Nakamoto.
“These are the blocks used to send 10 bitcoins to Hal Finney in January [2009] as the first bitcoin transaction,” Wright told a group of people at a “London proof session,” according to the BBC.
In a statement sent to SiliconANGLE, Jon Matonis, an economist and one of the founding directors of the Bitcoin Foundation, said that he was present at the session and now believed that Wright was indeed Nakamoto.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1457039.40
Bitcoin Talk doesn’t seem very impressed so far …
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/03/31/2158024/craig-wrights-upcoming-big-reveal/
-
Well, finally the speculation is over
-
yeah around 3-4 weeks ago he came out saying “soon I’m going to release info that will prove I’m Satoshi”
now he’s done it…although, yes…reading Reddit, Bitcointalk and other forums/blogs…not many people seem convinced or impressed.
people ask him to “move your coins or GTFO” but he’s stated many times the coins are locked in some Tulip Trust…and cant be moved till 2020.
Gavin, on the other hand does seem to believe Craig = Satoshi.
-
What we know is that he claims to possess copies of private keys for coin bases of some early BTC blocks. How he’s got them is another story.
-
I dont understand it completely, maybe you do @ghostlander
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hhreq/how_craig_constructed_the_message_that_he_signed/
BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45
FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY -
@ChekaZ This particular “proof” doesn’t prove anything. Take input script of the first Bitcoin transaction which is a public knowledge, convert to base64 and do whatever you want with it. If he signed a specific message with the private key of block #9 coin base, it could be a real proof.
-
@ghostlander said:
@ChekaZ This particular “proof” doesn’t prove anything. Take input script of the first Bitcoin transaction which is a public knowledge, convert to base64 and do whatever you want with it. If he signed a specific message with the private key of block #9 coin base, it could be a real proof.
I could read out of the comments that it isnt a proof, but I didnt understand why tbh. - Thanks :)
BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45
FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY -
@ChekaZ I think, (and ghost please let me know if Im wrong here) that basically rather than actually signing a message today he found an old signed message and tried to claim it was his.
This isnt exactly what happened but its the best way I can explain it as something similar.EDIT: after re reading that and thinking about it, its probably best to let someone else explain. Im of no help here. :confused:
-
Bitcoin watchers have long wondered why the giant cache of coins they attribute to Satoshi Nakamoto never moved on the bitcoin’s publicly visible blockchain. Wright’s “Tulip” trust fund of 1.1 million bitcoins may hold the key to that mystery. The trust fund PDF signed by Wright’s late friend David Kleiman keeps those coins locked in place until 2020, yet gives Wright the freedom to borrow them for applications including “research into peer-to-peer systems” and “commercial activities that enhance the value and position of bitcoin.”
Despite those exceptions to the trust’s rules, the million-coin hoard has yet to budge, even after Kleiman’s death in 2013. That may be because Wright could be keeping the coins in place as an investment. He could be leveraging the trust in less visible ways, like legally transferring ownership of money to fund his companies while still leaving it at the same bitcoin address. Or he might still be waiting for January 1st, 2020, a countdown to a date that could take the lid off the biggest cryptocurrency fortune in history.
-
I’m starting to feel sorry for Gavin …
[email protected] :
Man Gavin got extremely fooled.Matonis as well of course.
Gavin yesterday: “I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi.”
Gavin today: It’s certainly possible I was bamboozled.P.S. Scientist are becoming sceptical.
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-bitcoin-creator-unmasks-himselfwell.html
-
This a link to how the signing should have been done…
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0#post_core0100
-
Craig Wright admits he can’t prove he’s Satoshi …
http://www.drcraigwright.net/homepage.jpg
Background on Craig
Reading between the lines it looks like he may have hinted to “investors” in order to get Hotwire PE, after the Australian Raid - his private proof didn’t work in public
More than ten years later, in June 2013 – still two years before publications would claim he founded Bitcoin — Wright founded a now-defunct technology firm called Hotwire PE using $US23 million in Bitcoin (which also represents 1.5 per cent of all Bitcoin in existence), Wired reported.
The following February, he announced the company would be opening Denariuz, the first Bitcoin-based bank, Business Insider reported.
-
This has now become this stuff movies are made of.
first read this:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/satoshi-saga-continues-tulip-trust-trustee-expected-to-appear-by-september-says-joseph-vaughnperling-1462467803and then this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4i443g/highly_speculative_saotshis_bitcoin_in_a_trust/What a time to be a live! there are wild conspiracies on Reddit but I’m looking at all of this and my mind keeps going back to what’s in the Bitcoin Genesis Block…
The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
-
There are some weird things happened to Hal Finney …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Finney_(computer_scientist)
-
I never understood the concept of this trust or the release date…It would all just be promises right? At the end of the day if someone has access to the funds, they can move them.
-
Charlie Lee’s proof for example…
