Feathercoin Development Fund

ChekaZ

@wrapper Its the persons free choice to donate to a project they like, so even if its “irrelevant” in some peoples opinion, it wont mind. - The whole “project” thing doesnt aim to develop the “Core” that should remain to our devs, which could also setup a project for certain core-projects they would need funding to develop. It should focus more on services, applications and more, whatever someone likes to build for Feathercoin. - So I dont get your point “against” it.

Regards,
ChekaZ

Moonman

We could start by funding objective matters, like hosting, infrastructure, work with invoices etc that can be measured easily. As a first step, if you guys think that it would help with transparency.

wrapper

@ChekaZ An example of the problems left to deal with after a paid developments for FTC, the Coinnector service.

In addition to all the normal problems with the other “paid developments” , no documentation, support issues out weight usage, extra code to bug fix support, no documentation, poor form layouts etc .

Whereas, it was left in for the moment , as “experimental plugin”, it was not operable (whilst testing / bug fixing 0.9.1), as FTC had been “dropped” from Coinnector.

I noted that the application could have been registered for forwarding fees, which would be a way for FTC to self finance hosting of the web site and forum, or to donate to Github, or Bitcoin head , keeping FTC open source and “free”, but not included in the “for fee” development …

[Ref: ] https://github.com/wrapperband/FeathercoinWalletGuide

Whereas the core applications like the mobile-wallet have been ignored until it now doesn’t compile and is going to be a mammoth task to re-fork from head, with all the compatibility issue that gives with synchronising to the current 0.9.6.x releases branch …

It is not necessarily true that I am against something if I point out the possible problems, that is so we can avoid them. I am easily convinced by rational argument that my concerns are covered or at least being considered , or even understood.

AcidD

@ChekaZ - I assume the page will go up on Feathercoin.com once there’s a project posted in the section on the forums?

ChekaZ

@aciddude yes

SimonTower

I found this tweet now:

“would like to support/fund development so feathercoin can be used on the Lightning Network. Pm me please.”

https://twitter.com/TMetaphysical/status/863233570705293312

AcidD

@ChekaZ said in Feathercoin Development Fund:

@aciddude yes

:-) It took me a little while but I’ve posted. Let me know what you think @ChekaZ

ChekaZ

@SimonTower Damn how did I miss this one?

naskel

Before I post something on the project page, I will ask it here :)
What’s about a Video Conferencing (with multi point support) software crypted with feathercoin data ?

Wellenreiter

@naskel

Well, the only use for Feathercoin would be to use it as payment system for the usage of the video conference infrstructure.

For sure you can’t encrypt a video stream with block chain technology

naskel

Ok, Thanks!
I need to dig about that, later. :)