Posts made by UKMark

You rang? ;)
For the record…
I ONLY DEVELOPED IT.
I never even had access to the main hosting servers, only the development servers.
You need to speak to NutNut he hosted it all.
Hope this helps!

I’ll contact Peter over the next few days and see about getting the Featheraddress source integrated into the forum on a 443 connection. I am sure iawgoM can work his usual wizardry with the CSS.

I have just added a new game to cryptoulette.com

Introducing Cryptojack a Blackjack game for cryptocurrency…

How To Play:

1. Send funds to the displayed Feathercoin address above. These funds are held in your game wallet and can be cashed out instantly.

2. Once funds are received the game will start automatically.

3. Select the amount you wish to bet (MIN BET 1 FTC - MAX BET 100 FTC).

4. To start press deal.

5. Once the hand is played and the outcome known any winnings due will be automatically credited back to your game wallet.

**Note: **Make sure your Feathercoin client (wallet) is fully synced before sending your bet!

Payout Odds:

Cryptojack offers some of the best blackjack odds available and all on a single deck of 52 cards!

Win: Pays 1/1
Blackjack: Pays 3/2
MIN BET 1 FTC
MAX BET 100 FTC

Fairness:

All games are 100% Provably fair and the sha256 hash of the current 52 card deck play data is always displayed prior to the game starting!

Cryptojack uses the following game system:

First a Single 52 Card Deck is shuffled to produce the Hexidecimal play data like so:

5,2,7,a,3,4,1,2,c,4,7,8,5,8,7,5,d,1,6,6,c,6,4,9,a,8,3,c,8,9,d,6,a,c,7,b,4,2,b,1,9,5,3,b,d,2,1,d,b,a,9,3

This data is then displayed to the user in the form of a ‘sha256’ algorithm always using the txid of the first game wallet deposit as the salt, like so:

Play Data + TXID

The unhashed play data determines the play order of the following 52 cards from left to right, each number and letter represent a corresponding card using the following key:

ACE=1 - KING=d - QUEEN=c - JACK=b - 10=a - 2to9=2to9

Gameplay:

The dealer is dealt the first card face down then the player receives the next two cards then finally the dealer receives their second card.The dealer ALWAYS stands on both 17 and “soft” 17 (e.g. An initial ace and six).

Once the 52 cards have been played then the deck is re-shuffled and the previous decks unhashed play data is displayed once the current hand is over.

Note: As the game is card value dependent rather than suit dependant the suits are just randomly generated during gameplay, this means it may be possible to see card suit duplicates - but rest assured each 52 card deck consists of only 4 of each card value as proven by the revelead play data and sha256 hash’s thereof.

Many thanks to all who help me test.

Cryptoulette now running 0.8.6.1 Feathercoin daemon.

WIN!
Account Address= 6s6S8EabsLch2WVdxw1qb8QR3hx95hVa73
TXID= 7e73512bd6f28572cdc08cf077fccd1cd2f8af8b4d662072955864653cc6d6f1
Gamekey= 733qbBV5J2gp73p
Sender= 6idasj3Mfwc1Sr69NdC6udJ4LPunhhYuMm
Selection= 3RD12
Result= 29
Bet Amount= 1 FTC

3FTC Sent to your sig’ address:

f73a49f11cd1fb6b5c6ceb2c41907f368ba4d466abcda7bd4e699ba1a2830c7b

You have to win to get a payout :P

If you did win and didn’t get a payout then I need your TXID’s of the bet in question so I can investigate further…But it all appears to be working as should from the logs.

EDIT: I found one bet that didn’t payout - looks like the user ended the session before payout or possiblly more than one tab open at a time?

Like I say confirm TXID and I’ll investigate.

It depends by whom…I have my doubts as to the intentions of that buy wall, I believe that there are forces willing to sell at a future loss to undermine any of the alternative threats. The 51% attacks we witnessed before ACP would of cost a tidy sum also. Then again, maybe I am just too skeptical. :-\

Liverpool v Arsenal ([b]Home[/b])

Aston Villa v West Ham ([b]Home[/b])

Chelsea v Newcastle ([b]Home[/b])

Norwich v Man City ([b]Away[/b])

Southampton v Stoke ([b]Away[/b])

Sunderland v Hull ([b]Home[/b])

[code]Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 9 nodes
Date: 08/02/2014 13:54
To: 6pzShJBkWERKCbZ9RhVtaRjsvkwdwKCSrs
Debit: -2.00 FTC
Net amount: -2.00 FTC
Transaction ID: 2d8e704487438c61e2aa53fc28f02c1542b636832f10ecf1e16df9d54f833e29
[/code]

:D

[quote name=“new2crypto” post=“57376” timestamp=“1391645930”]
No interest whatsoever :o

Disappointed >:(
[/quote]

Yes it’s sad, I have spent many an hour/day/month developing games, services, online wallets, sms payment systems for Feathercoin and they have hardly been used. >:(

[quote name=“j0k3rhd” post=“55909” timestamp=“1391025584”]
Great site, Needed to stop :) …

Won nice amount tho :D

Could do with a blackJack, and so on :)
[/quote]

I actually started an HTML5 blackjack game but shelved it for roulette, I may look into this again should cryptoulette prove popular.
Thanks for feedback & playing! 8)

Cryptoulette.com

Now offering more games with unbeatable odds and all 100% provably fair!

[quote name=“slavco” post=“52384” timestamp=“1389793837”]
Why? :o
What were your server costs?
[/quote]

More than the profit :)

Is now offline ;(
Unfortunately over the past few months server running costs have been far outweighing any income.
I might trial a few new games in the future to see if I can get some fresh interest going but for now it’s a closed shop.
Just like to say many thanks to all who did support this project. 8)

[quote name=“ctt” post=“50113” timestamp=“1388970268”]
Don’t buy it if you are in the United States, paid 200 FTC for the bottle and shipping and it never made it.

ChekAz doesn’t know anything other than “he sent it”.
[/quote]

I can vouch for CheKaz being legit as mine arrived to the UK via DHL, possibly (as kevlar says) it is either stuck in customs or awaiting collection from your local depot?

[quote name=“UKMark” post=“50099” timestamp=“1388966254”]
[quote author=murlinn link=topic=3962.msg49841#msg49841 date=1388888419]
Greetings!

I seem to have done the same thing ghitzafunny did (multiple bets within a few seconds from the same address), and was wondering if you could check into this for me. Since you requested the transaction details from ghitzafunny, I’m going to assume you would like mine as well.

Status: 9 confirmations, broadcast through 12 nodes
Date: 1/4/2014 20:59
To: FTCgames - Bet Heads 6hEAdspy1ZRaUHST7zTSShWr6TKLVAoUKd
Debit: -25.00 FTC
Net amount: -25.00 FTC
Transaction ID: eba032aa7bb8609ac5ea2da783281a255695731bdc3f852374ce25ba493f7d1a

Thanks in advance bub!
(love the games btw!)
[/quote]

Will look into this 2mro (off to bed now) But as ghitz’ has said the result was tails:

[code]Heads or Tails
TXID for your placed bet: eba032aa7bb8609ac5ea2da783281a255695731bdc3f852374ce25ba493f7d1a
Secret Salt: 7063852fcc54ba74a9f0ad6ceb19a6789eae4f569a0b2e920ba7eebde2f1f49e
Sha256 Hash of TXID+SecretSalt: 1309184b0d9463bc197b102b982bd23c6f30a57a0adf87a6a81427a342459fa3
First four HEX bytes of resultant hash: 1309
Hexidecimal to Decimal conversion: 4873
Result: TAILS[/code]
[/quote]

OK I have looked into this and the bet [i]lose[/i] amount of [b]0.125[/b] FTC was indeed not sent back to the sending address: [url=http://explorer.feathercoin.com/address/6kiLjeng7Uy7JZhoELqAZW3vEfjMcnTsU6]http://explorer.feathercoin.com/address/6kiLjeng7Uy7JZhoELqAZW3vEfjMcnTsU6[/url]

I have just sent 0.125 FTC to you now:
[url=http://explorer.feathercoin.com/tx/eca1506d3e487a62c35d1186b85a7e3ca7d9e647aff15dab4905b5864bbc7718]http://explorer.feathercoin.com/tx/eca1506d3e487a62c35d1186b85a7e3ca7d9e647aff15dab4905b5864bbc7718[/url]

[quote name=“murlinn” post=“49841” timestamp=“1388888419”]
Greetings!

I seem to have done the same thing ghitzafunny did (multiple bets within a few seconds from the same address), and was wondering if you could check into this for me. Since you requested the transaction details from ghitzafunny, I’m going to assume you would like mine as well.

Status: 9 confirmations, broadcast through 12 nodes
Date: 1/4/2014 20:59
To: FTCgames - Bet Heads 6hEAdspy1ZRaUHST7zTSShWr6TKLVAoUKd
Debit: -25.00 FTC
Net amount: -25.00 FTC
Transaction ID: eba032aa7bb8609ac5ea2da783281a255695731bdc3f852374ce25ba493f7d1a

Thanks in advance bub!
(love the games btw!)
[/quote]

Will look into this 2mro (off to bed now) But as ghitz’ has said the result was tails:

[code]Heads or Tails
TXID for your placed bet: eba032aa7bb8609ac5ea2da783281a255695731bdc3f852374ce25ba493f7d1a
Secret Salt: 7063852fcc54ba74a9f0ad6ceb19a6789eae4f569a0b2e920ba7eebde2f1f49e
Sha256 Hash of TXID+SecretSalt: 1309184b0d9463bc197b102b982bd23c6f30a57a0adf87a6a81427a342459fa3
First four HEX bytes of resultant hash: 1309
Hexidecimal to Decimal conversion: 4873
Result: TAILS[/code]

[quote name=“ghitzafunny” post=“47404” timestamp=“1387924744”]
I have discovered a small error on the ftcgames site , maybe you noticed it too , maybe not :P , the Lose Payout is not x 0.005% , it is x0.5% or x0.005 eg.: 1x0.005%=1x(0.005/100)=0.00005 and 1x0.5%=1x0.005=0.005 (the actual lose payout) .If you think I helped you , please consider donating a small amount , I am a little FTC broke right now :P THX
[/quote]

Should of omitted the % sign…So even better odds than stated :)

Show me one xss possibilities that can evade ctype_alnum?..I am anal about sever side security, call me out, but honesty prevails…

I doubt you could truthfully santise at DOM level. You are giving ball back, surely?.

[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47897” timestamp=“1388180076”]
[quote author=UKMark link=topic=5663.msg47895#msg47895 date=1388179885]
I can’t believe user input wasn’t sanitised. It’s kindergarten coding. :-\
[/quote]

It is. That’s what’s screwing with magnet links. Because I’m using the browser’s built in loveliness, it’s converting & to & when it shouldn’t. I’ve not decided what approach is best to take with regards to this yet, but I’ll figure something out.
[/quote]

ctype_alnum, It’s all I trust tbh.