Not that i know … [url=http://zerocoin.org/index.html]http://zerocoin.org/index.html[/url]
They are still looking for a coin which is willing to implement their protocol.

How about the feedback section, lots of members loved the idea of adopting anonymity, it was voted up to the top, which should make it prio #1.
[url=http://feedback.feathercoin.com/forums/208241-general/suggestions/4048037-zerocoin-protocol-you-want-it-trust-me-]http://feedback.feathercoin.com/forums/208241-general/suggestions/4048037-zerocoin-protocol-you-want-it-trust-me-[/url]

And here some talk of Ian Miers:
Bitcoin 2013 conference - Zerocoin - A New Anonymous eCash Extension for Bitcoin
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7rnE9nqhic]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7rnE9nqhic[/url]

I mean how do we get a feedback of the feathercoin community ?
Whats the prio #1 thing to implement … ?

For me anonymity would be the killer feature.

Cheers.

Haha great talk :)

Richard Stallman: „We need anonymity to make democracy safe“

[url=http://youtu.be/RZ_3MKomQzY]http://youtu.be/RZ_3MKomQzY[/url]

Perhaps interesting too,
here is a reddit post from the owner of [url=https://coinapult.com]https://coinapult.com[/url] on the subject “Altcoin adoption”.

[url=http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rjv6l/my_response_to_a_litecoin_advocate/]http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rjv6l/my_response_to_a_litecoin_advocate/[/url]

And yeah ZeroCoin is just an idea, perhaps there will be more,
it’s about adding features, being different and give the altcoin a true reason to exist.

Cheers.

I think in the near future the bitmessage protocol will be able to transfer whole webpages and host
decentralized communities and marketplaces …

Here is a video where the bitmessage protocol is used via a proxy to transfer a whole webpage.
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy1z61VS5U0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy1z61VS5U0[/url]

When our feathercoin would be able to be anonymous and not just pseudonymous
(f.e.: ZeroCoin [url=http://spar.isi.jhu.edu/~mgreen/ZerocoinOakland.pdfs]http://spar.isi.jhu.edu/~mgreen/ZerocoinOakland.pdfs[/url])
it would be the first choice to fit this new concept of real decentralized global trading.

What u think ?

Cheers.

Hehe, me few weeks ago, same situation …
After checking everything, only reason left - motherboard broken.

Asrock 970 Ex 4 ;)

Got a new one in exchange and voila it works.

By the way, what CPU are you using ?
I got an AMD Sempron 145 and sometimes got problems with the PCIe “Lanes” while running 5 cards on one board …

So check different PCIe Slots and use Linux, Windows did not work for me …

[url=http://www.cryptobadger.com/2013/04/build-a-litecoin-mining-rig-linux/]http://www.cryptobadger.com/2013/04/build-a-litecoin-mining-rig-linux/[/url]

Cheers.

Well the operator just would make more money if the “full balance” is taken as 100% and the fee applies for the total amount, rather than taking the spendable amount as 100%. When it’s an external fee for the transaction he would even pay extra (the higher the amount and the fee percentage, the worse it gets). Also its way clearer for the customer to follow a simple percentage calculation ;)

Just my opinion. :P

Cheers.

Hi,

a = 100 FTC
b = 1%

–> c = 1 FTC (fee amount)
–> d = 99 FTC (spendable amount)

Recalculation of the fee amount © from the perspective of the spendable amount (d)
= (d/(100-b)*100)/100*b = c

Works for every fee and amount.

Hehe great ! And thanks for the suggestions :)

Cologne, Germany