[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“30244” timestamp=“1380817891”]
Silk Road legitimized Bitcoin as a currency and provided the largest marketplace that Bitcoin has had to date, cementing it’s value against real world items, stabilizing and increasing the price in a sustainable fashion.
Drugs were not the only thing sold there, and drugs are just as legitimate an item to use to peg a currency to a value as any other commodity.
Sites like Silk Road should have our support because they pave the way to mass adoption and legitimacy of the currency, provide liquidity, establish and entrench the value of the currency, and enable buyers of goods to reach sellers directly. The democratized model is the way of the future. It did for Bitcoin commerce what EBay did for Internet commerce.
Weather you like it or not, we are part of a revolution which bucks government controls and blatantly undermining them is exactly how progress is made. Just look at Egypt or Iran for examples of this, or the slipping grasp of Wall Street on our currency. It’s a downhill battle because as more and more people become entrenched in this market the inertia grows, and it’s rapidly reaching a tipping point where it’s moving under it’s own power inexorably.
Selling drugs is NEVER a cop-out. They are a legitimate commodity, and once that millions of people rely on for their health and well being. A world without drugs is one where millions of people suffer needlessly and die from afflictions which, due to modern technology, are avoidable, treatable, and curable.
The next generation of sites like Silk Road will further erode Government’s stranglehold on our freedom, because they (hopefully) won’t make the same mistakes as the prior generation.
[/quote]
C’mon… you cant be serious?
Your using Egypt and Iran as a model for progress? Your not trolling me are you ;)?
Silk Road was essential in establishing the foundation Bitcoin was built on. I’ll give you that. But Silk Road no longer has the impact on the Bitcoin ecosystem like it once had. This is outlined in the hard data in the charts. This article does a great job in explaining that.
[url=http://thegenesisblock.com/analysis-silk-roads-historical-impact-bitcoin/the]http://thegenesisblock.com/analysis-silk-roads-historical-impact-bitcoin/the[/url]
Drugs may be a commodity but they are certainly not “legitimate”. You can’t honestly say that the “goods” sold on Silk Road were essential to the health and survival of its users… You can try to overthrow the government and keep putting up illegal drug marketplaces like Silk Road all you want. But they are just going to be shutdown one after another and shed more and more negative light on Bitcoin. Mass adoption is what Bitcoin needs and the World does not need another outlet for illegal drug trade. If you need your drugs for a legitimate health concern great, go to the doctor and get a prescription. Silk Road users were not living in third world countries.
SR was a great experiment in proving the transactional value of Bitcoin. I would love it if more sites popped up like Silk Road but I think it would be far more beneficial if they sold “legitimate” goods rather than illegal drugs. There are other ways to “buck” the government…
Your arguing that Silk Road provided a “safe” outlet to sell drugs? C’mon man… DPR was hiring hits on his users. How long do you think this “safe” drug trade is going to last? The people using Silk Road were the same “thugs” and “criminals” that were buying drugs in the first place. You think they were just buying drugs for their own personal use? No, they were going right back to the streets and selling their discount, “high quality” drugs for a premium. If anything, SR was an accelerant to violent behavior.
It sounds like we have completely different ideologies. Whatever I say is never going to change your hardcoded beliefs.
So lets just agree to disagree eh?