Mastercoin
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47745” timestamp=“1388105178”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47743#msg47743 date=1388104426]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47734#msg47734 date=1388102340]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47730#msg47730 date=1388100904]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47704#msg47704 date=1388092237]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
[/quote]I’ve not decided on the user interface details for multiple blockchains. I figure search should be by default accords all block chains, with the option to check/uncheck coins. Publishing will likely just present the user with buttons for all available coins.
[b]I’m not sure what you mean about the analytics.[/b]
[/quote]I just was just wondering if Link has the ability to operate as a blockchain search engine if there’d be a feature akin to Google Analytics, tracking visitors and potentially making profit off pay-per-click equivalents, etc. I realize this is based off ad space but what if there was a way to create the same effect in encrypted terms - the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote][b]Link itself, the open source protocol, doesn’t cover that with its scope. But it’s entirely possible to do, and I suspect enterprising users who set up their own interface will do exactly that (hint hint).[/b]
[/quote]Well I’m long on ideas and short on implementation. Maybe I can invest in those enterprising users with FTC. ;)
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47743” timestamp=“1388104426”]
the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote]Some guy posted his blogs ([url=http://www.TuckFheman.com]www.TuckFheman.com[/url]) URL in Link last night and on the landing page are many advertisements.
I can only imagine what creative minds out there will do. This just means zerodrama (or someone else) will be creating an app called LinkSanitizer (powered by Flux) that will check all URL links (in Link) and highlight any nefarious links for the users protection. Or Kevlar just restricts posting URL’s or …
-
[quote name=“Tuck Fheman” post=“47749” timestamp=“1388106007”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47743#msg47743 date=1388104426]
the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote]Some guy posted his blogs ([url=http://www.TuckFheman.com]www.TuckFheman.com[/url]) URL in Link last night and on the landing page are many advertisements.
I can only imagine what creative minds out there will do. This just means zerodrama (or someone else) will be creating an app called LinkSanitizer (powered by Flux) that will check all URL links (in Link) and highlight any nefarious links for the users protection. Or Kevlar just restricts posting URL’s or …
[/quote]Actually entries can be demoted and superseded so don’t clack on nekkid links.
-
Wow.
Well there we go.
ftc ftw.
