Amd RX 480 gpu on Neoscrypt mining performance
-
We will see in a few days, release is on 6/29 i believe. If i can drop my power usage substantially while retaining or increasing hashrate I might finally retool the mine.
-
Yeah, we will have to see.
I did see this thread which isnt real promising. Talking about Eth mining tho. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523317.0
P2Pool Node: http://104.236.34.9:19327/ 0.5% fee
-
@AmDD said:
Yeah, we will have to see.
I did see this thread which isnt real promising. Talking about Eth mining tho. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523317.0
:smile: rumors…? its a matter of ‘price/hash/watt’…rit…? :confused:
if dats ‘early-photo’ is true…RX 480 still will be d ‘best-bang-for-buck’…?
.
.
.
p/s - luv d ‘early-batch’ of gpu-mining-peoples here… ‘they’ got capability+capacity to be an ‘early-batch’ to test d new-developement of crypto-mining things… raw reviews… ;o) -
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
We will see in a few days, release is on 6/29 i believe. If i can drop my power usage substantially while retaining or increasing hashrate I might finally retool the mine.
thanx for reply…
.
another thing… between RX 480 n R9 Nano, which is better…overall…?
.
.
**Hows d ‘meat’ delivary-order anyway…? got good response n support…? Keep up d gud thing RipperDragon fren…:+1: :+1::+1:
.
.
.
p/s - if not mistaken, ther got a Neoscrypt hardware performance compile/summary list before this at this forum, is it…?
-Is it ok if dat list…to be put like ‘some-kind’ of a highlighted section here around this forum…? at least it can be d best references due to Neoscrypt-GPU-Mining-Performance review n fact-results… -
R9 Nano is expensive still. About $460 now. It comes with a TDP of 175W and 4096 pipelines at up to 1GHz which are both good. The memory bandwidth offered is excessive for mining. Maybe the upcoming Vega with HBM2 will be better. We have no way of knowing it until 2017.
RX 480 with 36 compute units (2304 pipelines) at 14nm clocked above 1.1GHz seems good, though they advertise a TDP of 150W which seems too high. Maybe it’s the worst case scenario for RX 480X with 40 compute units (2560 pipelines).
However there is also Polaris 11 which is like one half of Polaris 10: 20 compute units (1280 pipelines), 128-bit memory. Could be a very good performance per watt and cost solution. Let’s see the prices.
-
Initial launch day results peg this at about the speed of an r9 290…so lower power but probably not much in the speed department
-
R9 Nano is expensive still. About $460 now. It comes with a TDP of 175W and 4096 pipelines at up to 1GHz which are both good. The memory bandwidth offered is excessive for mining. Maybe the upcoming Vega with HBM2 will be better. We have no way of knowing it until 2017.
RX 480 with 36 compute units (2304 pipelines) at 14nm clocked above 1.1GHz seems good, though they advertise a TDP of 150W which seems too high. Maybe it’s the worst case scenario for RX 480X with 40 compute units (2560 pipelines).
However there is also Polaris 11 which is like one half of Polaris 10: 20 compute units (1280 pipelines), 128-bit memory. Could be a very good performance per watt and cost solution. Let’s see the prices.
yerppp… let see d price… ;o)
-
@ghostlander yerpppp… let see d price…
about d Polaris 11, maybe it can be RX 490 then… ;o)
-
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
Initial launch day results peg this at about the speed of an r9 290…so lower power but probably not much in the speed department
thanx for d info, fren…
.
hows d price…? around USD199.00…?
finding dat d price will be different in different country globally… -
GTX 1060 at the end of the month for $250-300, says it should be as fast as a GTX 980 and use less power…
-
Some info about Nvidia card Neoscrypt mining performance…
.
https://cryptojunction.com/mining-hardware-currency/nicehash-neoscrypt/page/2/
