Feathercoin Core Wallet 0.9.3 , Welcome you
-
I think the imlementation of PoS takes much more time than adapting ACP to work with 0.9.3 and we all want to release the new version of the wallet.
In the mid and long term ACP will be replaced by PoS, but that is the next step.
-
I think the imlementation of PoS takes much more time than adapting ACP to work with 0.9.3 and we all want to release the new version of the wallet.
In the mid and long term ACP will be replaced by PoS, but that is the next step.
Still, why not to skip first step and focus on the final solution now?
-
I thought the same thing.
Why not kill 2 birds with one “Proof of” scheme.
We can spend a little time now on a band-aid solution, or we can fix the issue at its root.
Might take an extra week or so, but why softfork then hardfork?
One last Hardfork and its done.
IF, getting ACP working with sx is very simple, then sure, we can do that then work on PoS, but were waiting on those test net results aren’t we?
-
I see different opinions here.
Lizhi is keen to get his core released, what is understandable as it has a whole bunch of exciting new features.
Other people want to use the new features as soon as possible.
The release of the new version could give Feathercoin some new speed, agility and life
The implementation of a new Po? schema will take some month as the coding takes time and the severe testing needed prior to release will take even more time and several rounds of code adaption to fine tune and fix problems found out during the tests.
Addaption of ACP probably can be implemented in weeks, as it is just an adaption to the new core and it is tested already, so only minor testing is needed prior to release
So my conclusion is, if the release of the 0.9.3 core is not urgend and time critical, let’s go for the final solution, otherwise let’s make a first step and implement ACP in 0.9.3
By the way, Calem implementing AC is not a soft fork, it’s no fork at all
-
I can not disagree with a thing you just said there…
+1 Wellenreiter
-
Right. Lets get this juicy core out.
PoS will take some polishing. In fact, I know for a fact that there are more details needing worked out for it.
-
Feathercoin Broadcast Transaction Service, It support normal transaction and stealth transaction.
-
I see different opinions here.
Lizhi is keen to get his core released, what is understandable as it has a whole bunch of exciting new features.
Other people want to use the new features as soon as possible.
The release of the new version could give Feathercoin some new speed, agility and life
The implementation of a new Po? schema will take some month as the coding takes time and the severe testing needed prior to release will take even more time and several rounds of code adaption to fine tune and fix problems found out during the tests.
Addaption of ACP probably can be implemented in weeks, as it is just an adaption to the new core and it is tested already, so only minor testing is needed prior to release
So my conclusion is, if the release of the 0.9.3 core is not urgend and time critical, let’s go for the final solution, otherwise let’s make a first step and implement ACP in 0.9.3
By the way, Calem implementing AC is not a soft fork, it’s no fork at all
I rewrite SetBestChain function, It work all right. I think core wallet have supported ACP
-
Top work Lizhi! Bravo.
-
Good stuff lizhi, hopefully it can be released as official wallet soon
-
Well done Lizhi :)
-
Good stuff lizhi, hopefully it can be released as official wallet soon
I will ready some user’s guide for everyone to learn it.
-
So how did the testnet stuff go over the weekend?
Are we ready to push out core and start on the next major project?
We need to keep the momentum going and I can move on ahead if I get the all clear.
-
New MultiSig Page
https://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?/topic/8546-awesome-multisig-page/
Feathercoin core wallet with New MultiSig Page
-
Hi, start feathercoin testnet success.
feathercoin-qt.exe -testnet -addnode=pool.ftc-c.com
-
Great stuff Lizhi. Lets test the crap out of it :)
-
Awesome work lizhi, wow… I’m verifying Italian and Spanish langs now…
-
Awesome work lizhi, wow… I’m verifying Italian and Spanish langs now…
I guess translation file need be update, eg: bitcoin_lt.ts.
You can refer to Chinese(bitcoin_zh_CN.ts), some new classes need be translated.
-
Nice Lizhi, I’m testing all around these two langs and seems more or less ok.
Some parts are in English of course, but do not worry…
:)
-
Is the wallet API enabled? In other words, does the wallet support HTTP GET/PUT requests for things like “getbalance”, etc.? If so, is there documentation available?
Thanks.
