Mastercoin
-
There is no exodus address in FLUX. FLUX tokens are rewards for failed hashes which have the same difficulty as a winning hash but are rotated. We might have an argument for any arrangement of 0s which has an equal number of 0s. But for now they are simply blah00000000blahblah where they needed to be 00000000blahblahblah.
Kevlar, since you like Quantum Mechanics, I’m going to use a metaphor for the pilot wave theory (even if it’s not true the concept is still useful).
Miners, upon finding exchange announcements, will trade their failed hash rewards which have a value related to the difficulty to produce. Once pathways for exchange have been stored, “real coins” can only be sent over those pathways. That gives us a verification scheme that is distributed, self-moderating (I’ll explain this soon), and very difficult to fake.
I’m considering some features where FLUX tokens can be upgraded to real coins but I imagine most coins will resist this and will simply prefer to put the FLUX tokens on a traditional exchange.
Another Quantum Mechanics metaphor (limited context): Communities are hadrons. Real coins are quarks. FLUX tokens are gluons.
We are going to cause mind quakes.
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47704” timestamp=“1388092237”]
The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]DogeLink, much doge, many link.
-
[quote name=“zerodrama” post=“47707” timestamp=“1388092866”]
We are going to cause mind quakes.
[/quote]In quantum physics the future effects the past. You’ve already caused those mind quakes ZeroDrama. ;)
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47704” timestamp=“1388092237”]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47729” timestamp=“1388100465”]
[quote author=zerodrama link=topic=6387.msg47707#msg47707 date=1388092866]
We are going to cause mind quakes.
[/quote]In quantum physics the future effects the past. You’ve already caused those mind quakes ZeroDrama. ;)
[/quote]That’s… Not how retro causality works. But no worries. The future is still bright.
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47730” timestamp=“1388100904”]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47704#msg47704 date=1388092237]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
[/quote]I’ve not decided on the user interface details for multiple blockchains. I figure search should be by default accords all block chains, with the option to check/uncheck coins. Publishing will likely just present the user with buttons for all available coins.
I’m not sure what you mean about the analytics.
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47731” timestamp=“1388101615”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47729#msg47729 date=1388100465]
[quote author=zerodrama link=topic=6387.msg47707#msg47707 date=1388092866]
We are going to cause mind quakes.
[/quote]In quantum physics the future effects the past. You’ve already caused those mind quakes ZeroDrama. ;)
[/quote]That’s… Not how retro causality works. But no worries. The future is still bright.
[/quote]I thought recent science is slowly proving this is how backward causality likely operates if you carried out enough repeat experiments to produce a meaningful pattern. Existence could be the ultimate blockchain Kevlar.
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47740” timestamp=“1388103833”]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47731#msg47731 date=1388101615]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47729#msg47729 date=1388100465]
[quote author=zerodrama link=topic=6387.msg47707#msg47707 date=1388092866]
We are going to cause mind quakes.
[/quote]In quantum physics the future effects the past. You’ve already caused those mind quakes ZeroDrama. ;)
[/quote]That’s… Not how retro causality works. But no worries. The future is still bright.
[/quote]I thought recent science is slowly proving this is how backward causality likely operates if you carried out enough repeat experiments to produce a meaningful pattern. Existence could be the ultimate blockchain Kevlar.
[/quote]While retro causality is one of those mind bending phenomena in quantum mechanics, no matter how hard you try, you can’t communicate retroactively. If the accepted equations of relativistic quantum field theory are correct, it should never be possible to experimentally violate causality using quantum effects.
But they keep trying anyway.
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47734” timestamp=“1388102340”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47730#msg47730 date=1388100904]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47704#msg47704 date=1388092237]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
[/quote]I’ve not decided on the user interface details for multiple blockchains. I figure search should be by default accords all block chains, with the option to check/uncheck coins. Publishing will likely just present the user with buttons for all available coins.
[b]I’m not sure what you mean about the analytics.[/b]
[/quote]I just was just wondering if Link has the ability to operate as a blockchain search engine if there’d be a feature akin to Google Analytics, tracking visitors and potentially making profit off pay-per-click equivalents, etc. I realize this is based off ad space but what if there was a way to create the same effect in encrypted terms - the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47743” timestamp=“1388104426”]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47734#msg47734 date=1388102340]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47730#msg47730 date=1388100904]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47704#msg47704 date=1388092237]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
[/quote]I’ve not decided on the user interface details for multiple blockchains. I figure search should be by default accords all block chains, with the option to check/uncheck coins. Publishing will likely just present the user with buttons for all available coins.
[b]I’m not sure what you mean about the analytics.[/b]
[/quote]I just was just wondering if Link has the ability to operate as a blockchain search engine if there’d be a feature akin to Google Analytics, tracking visitors and potentially making profit off pay-per-click equivalents, etc. I realize this is based off ad space but what if there was a way to create the same effect in encrypted terms - the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote]Link itself, the open source protocol, doesn’t cover that with its scope. But it’s entirely possible to do, and I suspect enterprising users who set up their own interface will do exactly that (hint hint).
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47745” timestamp=“1388105178”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47743#msg47743 date=1388104426]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47734#msg47734 date=1388102340]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47730#msg47730 date=1388100904]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=6387.msg47704#msg47704 date=1388092237]
Link is coin agnostic. It works with all crypto-currencies which use the Satoshi-style blockchain.The website I’m still working on that beta testers are using uses the FTC blockchain, but in the near future, you’ll be able to choose which blockchain you want to publish on, and search accross blockchains seamlessly.
[/quote]Link sounds like a really cool technology of consolidation Kevlar, looking forward to it. So if I understand this right, there is currently an FTC ‘homepage block-chain’ equivalent before the user can search across any and all? Does this work the same way we are sent to Google’s homepage search engine first before having access to the ‘network’? And if not, would this be advantageous to have the user have to always first publish on FTC before moving on to the blockchain of their choosing? Also, is there a way to quantify traffic/analytics to a certain blockchain to FTC’s advantage?
[/quote]I’ve not decided on the user interface details for multiple blockchains. I figure search should be by default accords all block chains, with the option to check/uncheck coins. Publishing will likely just present the user with buttons for all available coins.
[b]I’m not sure what you mean about the analytics.[/b]
[/quote]I just was just wondering if Link has the ability to operate as a blockchain search engine if there’d be a feature akin to Google Analytics, tracking visitors and potentially making profit off pay-per-click equivalents, etc. I realize this is based off ad space but what if there was a way to create the same effect in encrypted terms - the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote][b]Link itself, the open source protocol, doesn’t cover that with its scope. But it’s entirely possible to do, and I suspect enterprising users who set up their own interface will do exactly that (hint hint).[/b]
[/quote]Well I’m long on ideas and short on implementation. Maybe I can invest in those enterprising users with FTC. ;)
-
[quote name=“Horizon” post=“47743” timestamp=“1388104426”]
the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote]Some guy posted his blogs ([url=http://www.TuckFheman.com]www.TuckFheman.com[/url]) URL in Link last night and on the landing page are many advertisements.
I can only imagine what creative minds out there will do. This just means zerodrama (or someone else) will be creating an app called LinkSanitizer (powered by Flux) that will check all URL links (in Link) and highlight any nefarious links for the users protection. Or Kevlar just restricts posting URL’s or …
-
[quote name=“Tuck Fheman” post=“47749” timestamp=“1388106007”]
[quote author=Horizon link=topic=6387.msg47743#msg47743 date=1388104426]
the ads in this case would be faux-addresses that led to the intended target?
[/quote]Some guy posted his blogs ([url=http://www.TuckFheman.com]www.TuckFheman.com[/url]) URL in Link last night and on the landing page are many advertisements.
I can only imagine what creative minds out there will do. This just means zerodrama (or someone else) will be creating an app called LinkSanitizer (powered by Flux) that will check all URL links (in Link) and highlight any nefarious links for the users protection. Or Kevlar just restricts posting URL’s or …
[/quote]Actually entries can be demoted and superseded so don’t clack on nekkid links.
-
Wow.
Well there we go.
ftc ftw.
